Cleveringa
(HC) Macklin v. Cleveringa
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DION MACKLIN, No. 2:19-cv-02598-TLN-CKD P Petitioner, v. ORDER CLEVERINGA, Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a state inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this habeas corpus action filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On April 2, 2020, respondent filed a motion to dismiss contending that petitioner’s federal habeas application does not raise any federal constitutional claim and, to the extent it does, the claim is unexhausted. ECF No. 11. To date, petitioner has not filed any opposition or statement of non-opposition to respondent’s motion. The court will sua sponte grant petitioner an extension of time to file such a response before ruling on the motion. Attached to this order is a notice for pro se parties pertaining to unexhausted claims for relief in a federal habeas application. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner shall file an opposition or statement of non-opposition…