Pierette
(PC) Dent v. Pierette
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRIAN KEITH DENT, No. 2:19-cv-01962-TLN-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER LENOIOR PIERETTE, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this federal civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on plaintiff’s complaint against defendants Barber and Adams, who are both medical doctors, on claims of Eighth Amendment medical indifference and negligence. ECF No. 5 (screening order). Currently pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion to modify defendants’ subpoena to the Records Custodian of the California Health Care Facility to inspect and copy plaintiff’s medical records from January 1, 2016 to the present. ECF No. 23. Defendants have not filed an opposition to the motion. I. Allegations in the Complaint Plaintiff alleges that defendants Dr. Adams and Dr. Barber were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs…