Winn

(PS) Conerly v. Winn

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 16, 20202:20-cv-01833California1,805 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES CONERLY, et al., No. 2:20-cv-01833 JAM AC PS Plaintiffs, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS HON. JOHN P. WINN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiffs are proceeding in this action pro se. This proceeding was referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(21). Plaintiffs have paid the filing fee, and new civil case documents have issued. ECF No. 3. Upon review of the complaint, the undersigned concludes that the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to hear this case and recommends that it be dismissed. I. The Complaint Plaintiffs Carina Conerly and her parents Marilyn Tillman-Conerly and James Conerly are suing Judge John Patrick Winn of the Superior Court of California, Sharif Roldan Tarpin, and Kiana Turner for alleged constitutional violations related to custody orders involving a minor child. ECF No. 1 at 2. Plaintiffs assert their basis for jurisdiction is 28 U.S.C. §1331,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.