Scott

(PC) Carroll v. Scott

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 18, 20201:20-cv-00086California1,028 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 CRAIG CARROLL, Case No. 1:20-cv-00086-EPG (PC) 10 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE BE v. DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, BECAUSE OF PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE SCOTT, et al., TO COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER AND TO PROSECUTE THIS CASE Defendants. (ECF No. 15)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN DAYS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN

DISTRICT JUDGE Craig Carroll (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action. On July 21, 2020, the Court screened Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint and found that it stated a cognizable claim. (ECF No. 15). The Court gave Plaintiff thirty days from the date of service of the order to either: “a. Notify the Court in writing that he wants to proceed only on his Bivens claim for excessive force in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.