(SS) Barron v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 18, 20202:19-cv-00119California2,493 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 THOMAS BARRON, No. 2:19-cv-119-EFB Plaintiff, v. ORDER ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security 14 Defendant. 15 16 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying his applications for a period of disability and Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act. The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment. ECF Nos. 17 & 20. For the reasons discussed below, plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is granted, the Commissioner’s motion is denied, and the matter is remanded for further proceedings. I. Background Plaintiff filed applications for a period of disability, DIB, and SSI, alleging that he had been disabled since August 20, 2014. Administrative Record (“AR”) 277-89. His applications were denied initially and upon reconsideration. Id. at 203-09, 212-19. A…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.