Santoro

(PC) Brooks v. Santoro

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 21, 20201:19-cv-00599California342 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES L. BROOKS, 1:19-cv-00599-AWI-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS CASE, WITH PREJUDICE,

vs. FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (ECF No. 11.) KELLY SANTORO, et al.,

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE IN

Defendants. FOURTEEN (14) DAYS

18 On July 30, 2020, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s Complaint for failure to state a claim, with leave to file a First Amended Complaint within thirty days. (ECF No. 11.) The thirty-day time period has now expired, and Plaintiff has not filed a First Amended Complaint or otherwise responded to the Court’s order. As a result, there is no pleading on file which sets forth any claims upon which relief may be granted. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that: 1. Pursuant to U.S.C. § 1915A and U.S.C. § 1915(e), this case be DISMISSED, with prejudice, based on Plaintiff’s failure to state a claim upon …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.