United Specialty Insurance Company v. Clarendon National Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 20201:19-cv-01715California2,281 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 UNITED SPECIALTY INSURANCE CASE NO. 1:19-cv-01715-AWI-BAM

COMPANY; KNIGHT SPECIALTY

INSURANCE COMPANY,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

Plaintiffs, MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF

SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION

v. (Doc. Nos. 8, 11, 25) CLARENDON NATIONAL INSURANCE

COMPANY,

11 Defendant. 12 1. Introduction This is a contribution and subrogation lawsuit between insurance companies. Plaintiff United Specialty Insurance Company (“USIC”) and Plaintiff Knight Specialty Insurance Company together filed this lawsuit against Defendant Clarendon National Insurance Company (“Clarendon” or “Defendant”). Plaintiffs alleged, first, that they expended over $75,000 to defend and indemnify their insureds against hundreds of construction defect claims and lawsuits and, second, that Defendant is a co-insurer of the insureds. Based on these allegations, Plaintiffs claim that they are entitled to equitable contribution and equitable subrogation from Defendant. In their…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.