Hosey

(PC) Shikeb Saddozai v. Hosey

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 21, 20201:19-cv-01611California661 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHIKEB SADDOZAI, No. 1:19-cv-01611-DAD-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

K. HOSEY, et al., (Doc. No. 3, 15) Defendants.

16 Plaintiff Shikeb Saddozai is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 29, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order be denied. (Doc. No. 15.) The findings and recommendations contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within thirty (30) days after service. (Id. at 2.) On May 15, 2020, plaintiff filed a motion for an extension of time to file a second amended complaint and objections to the findings and recommendations. (Doc. No. 16.) The magistrate judge granted the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.