Robertson

(HC) Norman v. Robertson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 20201:20-cv-00455California711 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL NORMAN, No. 1:20-cv-00455-DAD-JLT (HC) Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, GRANTING

v. RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS,

DISMISSING THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF

JAMES ROBERTSON, HABEAS CORPUS, AND DECLINING TO

ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF

Respondent. APPEALABILITY (Doc. Nos. 1, 10, 14) 17 18 Petitioner Daniel Norman is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 5, 2018, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that: (1) respondent James Robertson’s motion to dismiss the petition pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases (Doc. No. 10) be granted; (2) the pending habeas corpus petition be dismissed; and (3) a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.