Rohrdanz
(PC) Bahena v. Rohrdanz
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ESMELING L. BAHENA, Case No. 1:20-cv-00618-SKO (PC)
Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO
FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
v. OR NOTIFY THE COURT OF HIS
DESIRE TO PROCEED ONLY ON
D. ROHRDANZ, et al., CLAIMS FOUND COGNIZABLE
Defendants. (Doc. 1)
21-DAY DEADLINE
17 Plaintiff Esmeling L. Bahena alleges the defendants were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs. (Doc. 1.) The Court finds that Plaintiff states cognizable deliberate indifference claims against Defendants Rohrdanz and Manhas but not the remaining defendants. Therefore, the Court directs Plaintiff to file a first amended complaint curing the deficiencies identified in this order or, in the alternative, notify the Court that he wishes to proceed only on the claims founds cognizable and to dismiss the remaining claims and defendants. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The Court is required to screen…