Rohrdanz

(PC) Bahena v. Rohrdanz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 20201:20-cv-00618California2,961 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ESMELING L. BAHENA, Case No. 1:20-cv-00618-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

v. OR NOTIFY THE COURT OF HIS

DESIRE TO PROCEED ONLY ON

D. ROHRDANZ, et al., CLAIMS FOUND COGNIZABLE

Defendants. (Doc. 1)

21-DAY DEADLINE

17 Plaintiff Esmeling L. Bahena alleges the defendants were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs. (Doc. 1.) The Court finds that Plaintiff states cognizable deliberate indifference claims against Defendants Rohrdanz and Manhas but not the remaining defendants. Therefore, the Court directs Plaintiff to file a first amended complaint curing the deficiencies identified in this order or, in the alternative, notify the Court that he wishes to proceed only on the claims founds cognizable and to dismiss the remaining claims and defendants. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The Court is required to screen…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.