(PC) Ruiz v. Clark

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 20201:20-cv-00893California675 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8 GEORGE RUIZ, Case No. 1:20-cv-00893-EPG (PC) 9 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT CERTAIN v. CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS BE DISMISSED KEN CLARK, et al., (ECF NOS. 1 & 8) Defendants. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN DAYS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN

DISTRICT JUDGE George Ruiz (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed his complaint on June 29, 2020. (ECF No. 1). The Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint. (ECF No. 8). The Court found that Plaintiff’s complaint “states cognizable claims against (1) Defendants Ken Clark, D. Baughman, S. Alfaro, G. Jaime, J. Gallaghar and P. Llamas for (a) unconstitutional conditions of confinement in violation of the Eighth Amendment and (b) discriminatory treatment on account of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.