Petersen

Petersen v. Buyard

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 20201:20-cv-00954California2,639 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KYLE PETERSEN, No. 1:20-cv-00954-DAD-EPG Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER v. ORDER FINDING SERVICE OF

COMPLAINT APPROPRIATE FOR

MEKISHA BUYARD, DEFENDANT MEKISHA BUYARD

FORWARDING SERVICE DOCUMENTS TO

Defendant. PLAINTIFF (ECF NO. 1) 17 Plaintiff Kyle Petersen (“Plaintiff”) is a federal inmate proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint 19 commencing this action on July 9, 2020. (ECF No. 1). The Complaint brings a single claim under 20 the Fourth Amendment concerning the search of his cellular telephones. The Court finds that 21 Plaintiff’s complaint sufficiently states a claim to proceed past screening and directs service to 22 proceed.

I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT

24 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by inmates seeking relief against a 25 governmental entity or officer or employee of a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.