Dodd
(PC) Moore v. Dodd
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11 MARCUS J. MOORE, 1:20-cv-01321-GSA-PC 12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR v. PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO EXHAUST ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES BEFORE MICHELE DODD, et al., FILING SUIT (ECF No. 1.) Defendants. THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE TO RESPOND
21 I. BACKGROUND Marcus J. Moore (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 15, 2020, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) It appears on the face of Plaintiff’s Complaint that he has not exhausted his administrative remedies pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 41 U.S.C. § 1997 (e)(a), before filing this lawsuit. II. EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES Pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995, “[n]o action…