Rolfing

(PC) Parks v. Rolfing

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 20202:15-cv-01505California2,976 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KENNETH WAYNE PARKS, No. 2:15-cv-1505 KJM CKD P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS JEFFREY ROHLFING, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a California prisoner proceeding with counsel in an action for violation of civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The only remaining defendants are Dr. Jeffrey Rohlfing and Physician Assistant Rafael Miranda. At all times relevant, both were employed by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation at High Desert State Prison. On May 9, 2018, the court screened plaintiff’s operative fourth amended complaint (ECF No. 87) as the court is required to do under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a) and described plaintiff’s remaining claims against defendants Dr. Rohlfing and Miranda as follows: Plaintiff’s allegations that defendant Rohlfing continued to prescribe the same, ineffective antibiotic, delayed in ordering any kind of diagnostic testing, and failed to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.