(PS) Dewey v. Regents of University of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MELIKE DEWEY, No. 2:18-cv-3235-MCE-EFB PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 The court previously dismissed plaintiff’s original complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). ECF No. 6. Plaintiff was granted leave to file an amended complaint, and she has since filed a first amended complaint. As discussed below, the first amended complaint fails to state a claim, and it too must be dismissed. As previously explained to plaintiff, although pro se pleadings are liberally construed, see Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21 (1972), a complaint, or portion thereof, should be dismissed for failure to state a claim if it fails to set forth “enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 554, 562-563 (2007) (citing Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41 (1957)); see…