(PC) Quair v. CDCR HQ
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID SABINO QUAIR, III, No. 2:19-cv-1106 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER CDCR HQ, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is plaintiff’s motion to compel the “CDCR-HQ, et al to produce all discovery” for plaintiff. (ECF No. 12.) This request will be denied because it is vague, conclusory, and premature as plaintiff has not yet stated a cognizable claim against any defendant. (See ECF Nos. 15, 22.) Plaintiff has also filed a motion to compel “the office of the clerk in the Eastern, Northern, and Central Districts to produce all scheduling orders and all motions submitted since 10-28-18.” (ECF No. 13.) The Court construes this motion as a request for a copy of the docket and orders filed in each of plaintiff’s cases since October 28, 2018. The Court, however, cannot grant plaintiff’s request as…