(PC) Quair v. CDCR HQ

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 20202:19-cv-01106California1,797 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID SABINO QUAIR, III, No. 2:19-cv-1106 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER CDCR HQ, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is plaintiff’s motion to compel the “CDCR-HQ, et al to produce all discovery” for plaintiff. (ECF No. 12.) This request will be denied because it is vague, conclusory, and premature as plaintiff has not yet stated a cognizable claim against any defendant. (See ECF Nos. 15, 22.) Plaintiff has also filed a motion to compel “the office of the clerk in the Eastern, Northern, and Central Districts to produce all scheduling orders and all motions submitted since 10-28-18.” (ECF No. 13.) The Court construes this motion as a request for a copy of the docket and orders filed in each of plaintiff’s cases since October 28, 2018. The Court, however, cannot grant plaintiff’s request as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.