(PS) Narayan v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 20202:19-cv-00466California1,081 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PRAKASH NARAYAN, No. 2:19-cv-00466-TLN-CKD PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., (ECF Nos. 89, 90, 91, 95.) Defendants. 16 17 Presently before the court are plaintiff’s motion to amend, motion to change venue and to extend time, and motion for a preliminary injunction. (ECF Nos. 89, 90, 91, 95.) Defendants have filed oppositions and plaintiff has replied. (ECF Nos. 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103.) Pursuant to Local Rule 230(g) this court vacated the hearing on these motions. Having considered the parties’ filings, the law, and the relevant facts, the court orders as follows. Motion to Change Venue (ECF Nos. 90, 95) Courts may transfer venue under either § 1404(a) or § 1406(a). Under § 1404(a), a district court may transfer an action to another district where a matter might have been brought “for the

1 Plaintiff’s two motions to change venue (ECF Nos. 90, 95), are similar; however, the latter…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.