Foss

(HC) Boswell v. Foss

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 20202:20-cv-00798California907 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BUCK EDWARD BOSWELL, No. 2:20-cv-00798-CKD P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FOSS, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Examination of the request to proceed in forma pauperis reveals that petitioner is unable to afford the costs of suit. Accordingly, the request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). I. Factual and Procedural History Petitioner was convicted in the Tehama County Superior Court on five counts of drug offenses in violation of various provisions of California’s Health and Safety Code. ECF No. 1 at 2. On May 5, 2006, petitioner was sentenced to 22 years in prison. Id. In his federal habeas application, petitioner…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.