(SS) Midwood v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 20202:19-cv-01451California4,219 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMIE MARGARET MIDWOOD, No. 2:19-cv-1451 DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security1, 15 Defendant. 17 This social security action was submitted to the court without oral argument for ruling on plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment.2 Plaintiff’s motion argues that the Administrative Law Judge improperly rejected medical opinion evidence and plaintiff’s testimony, and that the step five finding was unsupported. //// ////

24 1 Andrew Saul became the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration on June 17, 2019. See https://www.ssa.gov/agency/commissioner.html (last visited by the court on July 30, 2019). Accordingly, Andrew Saul is substituted in as the defendant in this action. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (referring to the “Commissioner’s Answer”); 20 C.F.R. § 422.210(d) (“the person holding the Office of the Commissioner shall, in his official capacity,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.