City of Sacramento v. TEVA Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CITY OF SACRAMENTO et al., No. 2:20-cv-01824-MCE-CKD Plaintiffs, v. ORDER TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD. et al., 15 Defendants.

17 On September 17, 2020, the Court granted Plaintiffs’ Ex Parte Application for an Expedited Briefing Schedule and Hearing on their Motion to Remand. ECF Nos. 13, 17. Presently before the Court is Defendants’ Ex Parte Application for Reconsideration, and this matter has been fully briefed. ECF Nos. 18, 19, 21. The Court construes Defendants’ Motion as a motion for reconsideration under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e), and it is hereby GRANTED. A motion for reconsideration is properly brought pursuant to either Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) or Rule 60(b). Taylor v. Knapp, 871 F.2d 803, 805 (9th Cir. 1989). Such a motion is treated as a Rule 59(e) motion if filed within twenty-eight days of entry of judgment, but as a Rule 60(b) motion if filed more than twenty-eight days after judgment is…