Huitt
Huitt v. TEVA Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 20202:20-cv-00954California2,628 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 PATRICIA HUITT, No. 2:20-cv-00954-WBS-KJN Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE:
DEFENDANTS TEVA WOMEN’S
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., HEALTH, LLC, TEVA WOMEN’s
TEVA WOMEN’S HEALTH LLC; TEVA HEALTH, INC. AND TEVA
WOMEN’S HEALTH INC. et al., PHARMACEUTICAL USA, INC.’S
MOTIONS TO DISMISS
Defendants. 18 ----oo0oo---- Plaintiff Patricia Huitt (“plaintiff” or “Huitt”) brought this action against Teva Women’s Health, LLC, Teva Women’s Health, Inc., and Teva Pharmaceutical USA, Inc. (“defendants” or “Teva”) seeking damages related to the defendants’ design, manufacture, surveillance, sale, marketing, advertising, promotion, labeling, packaging, and distribution of the ParaGard Intrauterine Medical Device (“ParaGard IUD”). Before the court are the Teva defendants’ substantively identical motions to dismiss for failure to state a…