Huitt

Huitt v. TEVA Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 20202:20-cv-00954California2,628 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 PATRICIA HUITT, No. 2:20-cv-00954-WBS-KJN Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE:

DEFENDANTS TEVA WOMEN’S

TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., HEALTH, LLC, TEVA WOMEN’s

TEVA WOMEN’S HEALTH LLC; TEVA HEALTH, INC. AND TEVA

WOMEN’S HEALTH INC. et al., PHARMACEUTICAL USA, INC.’S

MOTIONS TO DISMISS

Defendants. 18 ----oo0oo---- Plaintiff Patricia Huitt (“plaintiff” or “Huitt”) brought this action against Teva Women’s Health, LLC, Teva Women’s Health, Inc., and Teva Pharmaceutical USA, Inc. (“defendants” or “Teva”) seeking damages related to the defendants’ design, manufacture, surveillance, sale, marketing, advertising, promotion, labeling, packaging, and distribution of the ParaGard Intrauterine Medical Device (“ParaGard IUD”). Before the court are the Teva defendants’ substantively identical motions to dismiss for failure to state a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.