Loescher

Loescher v. County of Plumas

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 21, 20202:19-cv-01984California5,643 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LYNNE LOESCHER, No. 2:19-cv-1984-KJM-KJN Plaintiff,

v. ORDER

14 COUNTY OF PLUMAS, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Defendants County of Plumas (“County”) and Plumas County Sheriff Greg Hagwood (“Sheriff Hagwood”) move to dismiss plaintiff Lynne Loescher’s claims. Mot. to Dismiss (“MTD”), ECF No. 16, at 1. Plaintiff filed an opposition. Opp’n, ECF No. 24. Defendants replied. Reply, ECF No. 26. The court heard oral argument, held by videoconference, on June 26, 2020, with Larry Baumbach appearing for plaintiff, Shanan Hewitt appearing for the County and Sheriff Hagwood, and James Walter appearing for defendant California Highway Patrol Officer Macloud Lutney (“Officer Luntey”). Hr’g Min., ECF No. 27. For the reasons below, the court GRANTS defendants’ motion to dismiss. ///// ///// ///// I. BACKGROUND On or about August 30, 2018, plaintiff operated a vehicle on California State Route 70 near the Greenville…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.