CDCR

(PC) Connor v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 20202:19-cv-02088California835 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BARBARA A. CONNOR, No. 2:19-cv-2088-TLN-EFB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983. After dismissal of her two prior complaints pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) 19 (ECF Nos. 6 & 8), she has filed a second amended complaint (ECF No. 9), which the court must 20 now screen.1 21 The second amended complaint reads in its entirety, as follows:

I, Barbara A. Connor, claim “Deliberate Indifference” against the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and Dr. Jerry W. Weiner. I believe 24 that Dr. Jerry Weiner knew of my criminal case because of the proximity of Stockton to Manteca w[h]ere Dr. Weiner’s practice is at Doctor’s Hospital and 26 1 Pursuant to § 1915(e)(2), the court must dismiss the case at any time if it determines the allegation of poverty is untrue,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.