(PC) David Roberts v. CSP - SAC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 20202:20-cv-01564California1,709 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID ROBERTS, No. 2: 20-cv-1564 JAM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER CSP-SAC, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a prisoner, proceeding pro se. On September 2, 2020, the undersigned recommended that this action be dismissed based on plaintiff’s failure to keep the court apprised of his current address. (ECF No. 10.) On September 16, 2020, plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 12.) Good cause appearing, the findings and recommendations are vacated; Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Plaintiff is required to pay the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.