(PS) Murphy v. AIG Claims, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 20202:20-cv-00301California820 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHANNON O. MURPHY, SR., No. 2:20-cv-00301 TLN AC PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AIG CLAIMS, INC., Defendant. 16 This matter is before the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On July 8, 2020, District Judge Troy L. Nunley adopted the undersigned’s findings and recommendations that this case be dismissed due to plaintiff’s failure to prosecute. ECF Nos. 8 (Order) and 9 (Judgment). On September 21, 2020, plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration, which the undersigned construes as a motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) because plaintiff “demands this court case be replaced active[.]” ECF No. 10 at 2. For the reasons that follow, plaintiff’s motion should be DENIED, and the court should disregard all further filings in this case. I. ANALYSIS Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides for reconsideration of a final 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.