(PC) Rabiee v. Shasta County Correctional Facility

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 20202:20-cv-00514California3,728 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HAMID RABIEE, No. 2:20-cv-0514 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SHASTA COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff is a pretrial detainee pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint was recently screened and found to be devoid of a cognizable claim. Plaintiff’s first amended complaint is before the Court for screening. I. Screening Requirement The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2). //// //// II. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.