(PC) Davis v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 20202:20-cv-01347California379 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FITZGERALD DAVIS, No. 2:20-cv-1347 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is county jail detainee proceeding pro se with a civil rights lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges that the Rio Consumnes Correctional Center is not complying with the Center for Disease Control’s guidelines on COVID-19. By order dated July 17, 2020, the complaint was dismissed with leave to amend for failure to state a claim. (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff was directed to file an amended complaint within sixty days and warned that failure to do so may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The time to file an amended complaint has expired and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, requested additional time to file an amended complaint, updated his address, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Because plaintiff has failed to do so, the court will 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.