Peery

(HC) Viera v. Peery

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20202:19-cv-01573California843 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 DANIEL HECTOR VIERA, No. 2:19-cv-1573 WBS DMC Petitioner, v. ORDER SUZANNE M. PEERY Respondent. 17 ----oo0oo---- Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules. On July 23, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within the time specified therein. (See Magistrate’s Findings and Recommendations (“Magistrate’s F&R”) (Docket No. 17).) Timely objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed. Specifically, petitioner objects to the magistrate judge’s finding that his petition for a writ of habeas…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.