Carson

(PC) Goods v. Carson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20202:20-cv-00416California1,797 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GREGORY GOODS, No. 2:20-cv-0416-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

DAVID BAUGHMAN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff proceeds without counsel in this action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He has filed an amended complaint (ECF No. 14) which the court must screen. Screening I. Legal Standards Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners seek redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must identify cognizable claims or dismiss the complaint, or any portion of the complaint, if the complaint “is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted,” or “seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief.” Id. § 1915A(b). A pro se plaintiff, like other litigants, must satisfy the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.