(PC) Gleason v. Lee

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20202:19-cv-00621California2,915 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS LEE GLEASON, Jr., No. 2:19-cv-621-WBS-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

M. VOONG, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff proceeds in this section 1983 suit without counsel and alleges that: (1) defendants Williams, Moss, Myers, Justin, and Lee for violating his First Amendment right to send mail and to be free from retaliation for engaging in activity protected by the First Amendment; (2) defendant Johnson retaliated against him for protected activity in violation of the First Amendment; and (3) defendants1 Williams, Myers, Moss, and Justin for violating his right to procedural due process under the Fourteenth Amendment. ECF No. 1; ECF No. 9 (court’s screening order). Now, defendants Justin, Lee, Moss, Myers, and Williams (hereinafter “defendants”) have filed a motion to dismiss the claims against them. ECF No. 26. Plaintiff has filed an opposition (ECF No. 28) and defendants have filed a reply (ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.