Ramirez
Ramirez v. City of Bakersfield
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY MARKIS RAMIREZ, et al., No. 1:19-cv-01413-DAD-JLT Plaintiffs, v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, et al., (Doc. No. 8) Defendants.
16 On November 19, 2019, defendants City of Bakersfield, Isaac Aleman, and Ryan McWilliams (collectively “defendants”) moved for a stay in this action. (Doc. No. 8.) Plaintiffs Anthony Markis Ramirez and Marinah Renae Segura (collectively, “plaintiffs”), who are represented by counsel in this action, have not opposed the pending motion, filed a statement of non-opposition, or otherwise communicated with the court regarding the pending motion. The court deems the motion suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). Having considered the defendants’ motion, and for the reasons stated below, the court will grant the motion to stay.
The undersigned apologizes for the delay in the issuance of this order. This court’s 26…