Quick

(PC) Jackson v. Quick

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20201:19-cv-01591California4,971 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 CORNEL JACKSON, No. 1:19-cv-01591-NONE-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION

v. PROCEED ON PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS

AGAINST DEFENDANTS JASON QUICK,

JASON QUICK, et al., ELIZABETH ALVAREZ, A. ROSSETTE, LT.

FOLLOWELL, LISETTE LOPEZ, DOMINIC

Defendants. RAMOS, KASANDRA SANCHEZ,

HERMINA MARLEY, AND C. PURDENTE

FOR VIOLATING PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AND

SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS WITH

RESPECT TO PLAINTIFF’S LEGAL

CORRESPONDENCE AND FOR

CONSPIRACIES TO VIOLATE SUCH

RIGHTS AND AGAINST DEFENDANT

ELIZABETH ALVAREZ, FOR VIOLATING

PLAINTIFF’S RIGHT OF ACCESS TO THE

COURTS, AND THAT ALL OTHER CLAIMS

AND DEFENDANTS BE DISMISSED

20 (ECF NO. 25)

TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE

22 Plaintiff Cornel Jackson (“Plaintiff”) is a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.