Baniga
(PC) Garcia v. Baniga
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20201:19-cv-01258California710 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JOSE GARCIA, 1:19-cv-01258-AWI-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE BE
v. DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR
FAILURE TO OBEY COURT ORDER
U. BANIGA, M.D., et al., (ECF No. 24.)
Defendants. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE IN
FOURTEEN (14) DAYS
17 On August 17, 2020, the Court issued an order requiring Plaintiff to file a response to defendant Rodriguez’s motion to compel filed on July 2, 2020, within thirty days. (ECF No. 24.) The thirty-day deadline has now expired and Plaintiff has neither filed a response to the motion to compel or filed any other response to the Court’s order.1 In determining whether to dismiss this action for failure to comply with the directives set forth in its order, “the Court must weigh the following factors: (1) the public’s interest in expeditious resolution of litigation; (2) the court’s need to manage its docket; (3) the risk of