(PC) Beaton v. Valley State Prison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 1, 20201:20-cv-00005California734 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 PAUL NIVARD BEATON, CASE NO. 1:20-cv-0005 NONE JLT (PC)

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Plaintiff, TO DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

14 v. (Doc. 21.) SERGEANT D. MILLER, et al., FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE Defendants. 18 Plaintiff moves for a temporary restraining order barring officials at Valley State Prison in Coachella, California from transferring him to another institution, which plaintiff contends is in retaliation for this pending civil rights action. (Doc. 21.) The analysis for a temporary restraining order is substantially identical to that for a preliminary injunction. Stuhlbarg Intern. Sales Co., Inc. v. John D. Brush and Co., Inc., 240 F.3d 832, 839 n.7 (9th Cir. 2001). A preliminary injunction should not issue unless necessary to prevent threatened injury that would impair the court’s ability to grant effective relief in a pending action. “A…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.