Alcantar

(PC) VanFossan v. Alcantar

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 1, 20201:20-cv-00173California7,845 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BENJAMIN VANFOSSAN, No. 1:20-cv-00173-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION

v. PROCEED ON PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS

AGAINST DEFENDANTS AMAYA,

ESTELA ALCANTAR, et al., ALKIRE, CRUZ, GONZALES, HUERTA,

LEWANDOWSKI AND ROBLES FOR

Defendants. VIOLATING PLAINTIFF’S RIGHT TO DUE

PROCESS AND THAT ALL OTHER

CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS BE

DISMISSED

17 (ECF NO. 15)

TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO APPOINT

DISTRICT JUDGE 21 Plaintiff Benjamin VanFossan (“Plaintiff”) is a state inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on January 24, 2020, (ECF No. 1), which the Court screened. Then on August 12, 2020, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint, (ECF No. 15), and objections to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.