Santiesteban
(PC) Valenzuela v. Santiesteban
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARIO A. VALENZUELA, Case No. 1:20-cv-01093-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO
v. ACTION SANTIESTEBAN, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
REGARDING DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN
Defendants. CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS (ECF Nos. 1, 6, 9)
FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE
17 I. Background Plaintiff Mario A. Valenzuela (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 20, 2020, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that Plaintiff stated a cognizable claim against Defendants Santiesteban, Rodriguez, and Alejo for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment for the incident on June 22, 2019 and a cognizable claim against Defendant Perez for failing to protect against the alleged excessive force by Santiesteban, Rodriguez, and Alejo for the incident on June 22,…