Burns

(PC) Armenta v. Burns

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20201:20-cv-00968California3,385 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 RICHARD ARMENTA, Case No.: 1:20-cv-00968-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE

v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

BURNS, et al., REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION FOR

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

Defendants. (ECF No. 11)

FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE

15 Plaintiff Richard Armenta (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 16 pauperis in this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint 17 and granted leave to amend. (ECF No. 1, 10.) Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, filed on 18 September 14, 2020, is currently before the Court for screening. (ECF No. 11.)

I. Screening Requirement and Standard

20 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a 21 governmental entity and/or against an officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. 22 § 1915A(a). Plaintiff’s complaint, or any portion thereof, is subject to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.