Mendoza

Mendoza v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 1, 20201:20-cv-01133California1,187 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

56w 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERIKA MENDOZA, JAMES HUNT, Case No. 1:20-cv-01133-DAD-BAM individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO SEAL

DOCUMENTS WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Plaintiffs, (Doc. No. 164) v.

ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC., et al., 16 Defendants.

18 Before the Court is Defendants Electrolux Home Products, Inc., Lowe’s Home Centers, 19 LLC and Modesto Direct Appliance, Inc.’s (collectively “Defendants”) request to seal documents. 20 (Doc. No. 164.) Defendants seek a court order authorizing the sealing of the following 21 documents or portions of documents: 22 The Amended Complaint of Erika Mendoza, James Hunt, and all others similarly situated (collectively “Plaintiffs”) at Paragraphs 8, 9, 42 (in part), 43 (in part), 44 (in part), 50, 54, 56 (in part), 59 (in part), 60 (in part), 62 (in part), 63 (in part), 68 (in part), 70 (in part), 72 (in part), 76 (in part), 77 (in part), 78 (in part), 83 (in part), 98 (in part), 99 (in part), 103…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.