Rodriguez

(PC) Bland v. Rodriguez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20201:20-cv-00478California1,102 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSHUA BLAND, No. 1:20-cv-00478-DAD-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

ROBERT RODRIGUEZ, et al., (Doc. No. 16) Defendants.

16 Plaintiff Joshua Bland is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 18, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge screened plaintiff’s first amended complaint (“FAC”) and issued the pending findings and recommendations. (Doc. No. 16.) The magistrate judge found that plaintiff alleged cognizable failure to protect claims against defendants Stark, Jaime, Rodriguez, Garay, Melendrez, Lewis, and Isais, but that he failed to allege any other cognizable claim against any other defendant. (Id.) Accordingly, the findings and recommendations recommended (1) that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.