Rodriguez
(PC) Bland v. Rodriguez
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSHUA BLAND, No. 1:20-cv-00478-DAD-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
ROBERT RODRIGUEZ, et al., (Doc. No. 16) Defendants.
16 Plaintiff Joshua Bland is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 18, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge screened plaintiff’s first amended complaint (“FAC”) and issued the pending findings and recommendations. (Doc. No. 16.) The magistrate judge found that plaintiff alleged cognizable failure to protect claims against defendants Stark, Jaime, Rodriguez, Garay, Melendrez, Lewis, and Isais, but that he failed to allege any other cognizable claim against any other defendant. (Id.) Accordingly, the findings and recommendations recommended (1) that…