Kyle
(PC) Harris v. Kyle
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DEVONTE B. HARRIS, Case No. 1:19-cv-00462-DAD-EPG (PC) 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT BE
v. D
ENIED
K. KYLE, et al., (ECF NO. 49) Defendants.
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
THIRTY DAYS 17 Plaintiff, Devonte B. Harris, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint adding claims for excessive force claim against three new defendants and a deliberate indifference to risk of suicide claim against a fourth new defendant. (ECF No. 49.) Leave to amend a complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a) “shall be freely given when justice so requires.” Keniston v. Roberts, 717 F.2d 1295, 1300 (9th Cir. 1983). “This policy is to be applied with extreme liberality.” Eminence Capital, LLC v.…