(PC) Razaq v. California Department of Corrections

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20201:20-cv-01116California3,615 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KAHLILULLAH RAZAQ, Case No.: 1:20-cv-01116-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE

v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION FOR CORRECTIONS, et al., FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM 15 Defendants. (ECF No. 15)

FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE

17 Plaintiff Kahlilullah Razaq (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and granted him leave to amend. (ECF Nos. 1, 10.) Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, filed on September 21, 2020, is currently before the Court for screening. (ECF No. 15.) I. Screening Requirement and Standard The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity and/or against an officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.