Perkins

(PC) Cresci v. Perkins

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20201:20-cv-00412California2,569 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CARLO GUILIANO CRESCI, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-00412-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) SECOND SCREENING ORDER GRANTING v. ) PLAINTIFF ONE FINAL OPPORTUNITY TO

AMEND THE COMPLAINT

PERKINS, et al., ) ) (ECF No. 30) Defendants. ) ) ) ) )

Plaintiff Carlo Guiliano Cresci is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s amended complaint, filed August 31, 2020. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.