(PC) Barnes v. Van Ness

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 20201:20-cv-00625California582 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7 ANTOINE DESHAWN BARNES, No. 1:20-cv-00625-NONE-EPG (PC) 8 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. (Doc. Nos. 13, 14, 15, & 18)

VAN NESS,

11 Defendant.

13 14 Antoine Deshawn Barnes (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 6, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge entered findings and recommendations, recommending that plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief be denied. (Doc. No. 14 at 4.) Therein, plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections within fourteen days after being served with the findings and recommendations. The deadline to file objections has passed and plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. However, on August 10, 2020 and August 12, 2020,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.