Sherman

(PC) Winters v. Sherman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 20201:20-cv-00647California1,148 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EUGENE WINTERS, Case No. 1:20-cv-00647-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO

v. ACTION SHERMAN, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS ACTION, WITHOUT PREJUDICE,

Defendants. FOR FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT ORDER

AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

16 (ECF No. 9)

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

18 I. Background Plaintiff Eugene Winters (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 13, 2020, the Court screened the complaint and found that Plaintiff stated a cognizable claim for unconstitutional conditions of confinement in violation of the Eighth Amendment against Defendants Sherman and Milan, but failed to state any other cognizable claims for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.