Sherman
(PC) Winters v. Sherman
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EUGENE WINTERS, Case No. 1:20-cv-00647-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO
v. ACTION SHERMAN, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
DISMISS ACTION, WITHOUT PREJUDICE,
Defendants. FOR FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT ORDER
AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
16 (ECF No. 9)
FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE
18 I. Background Plaintiff Eugene Winters (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 13, 2020, the Court screened the complaint and found that Plaintiff stated a cognizable claim for unconstitutional conditions of confinement in violation of the Eighth Amendment against Defendants Sherman and Milan, but failed to state any other cognizable claims for…