Rangel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHRISTIAN RANGEL, Case No. 1:19-cv-00638-NONE-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO SHOW

CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT

v. ISSUE FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH

COURT ORDER

CITY OF MODESTO, et al., (ECF No.) Defendants.

FIVE DAY DEADLINE

16 A notice of settlement was filed in this action and the parties were ordered to file dispositional documents within forty-five days of August 13, 2020. (ECF Nos. 21, 22.) More than forty-five days have passed and dispositional documents have not been filed as required by the August 13, 2020 order. Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court.” The Court has the inherent power to control its docket and may, in the exercise of that power, impose sanctions where appropriate, including dismissal of the action. Bautista v.…