Diaz

(PC) Howell v. Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 1, 20201:19-cv-01612California426 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KAREEM HOWELL, Case No. 1:19-cv-1612-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER TO ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE; AND

v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS CASE FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY

N. DIAZ, et al., WITH COURT ORDER AND FAILURE TO Defendants. PROSECUTE

FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE

17 Plaintiff’s complaint was recently screened and found to state the following cognizable 18 claims: (1) a First Amendment retaliation claim against defendants Diaz, Garcia, Linon, and 19 Ceballos; (2) a First Amendment mail mishandling claim against Diaz; (3) an Eighth Amendment 20 excessive force claim against Garcia and Ceballos; and (4) an Eighth Amendment medical 21 indifference claim against Ceballos. (Doc. 10.) No other claims were cognizable as pled. 22 In that screening order, plaintiff was directed to submit a notice indicating whether he wished 23 to proceed with the complaint as screened, whether he wished to file a new pleading, or whether 24…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.