Hunt

(PC)Moore, Jr. v. Hunt

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20201:20-cv-01020California972 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 EZELL MOORE, JR., Case No. 1:20-cv-01020-EPG (PC) 10 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE BE v. DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, BECAUSE OF PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE HUNT, et al., TO PROSECUTE THIS CASE AND FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A COURT Defendants. ORDER

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN DAYS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN

DISTRICT JUDGE

17 Ezell Moore, Jr. (“Plaintiff”), is a prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on July 23, 2020. (ECF No. 1). Plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2), but it was not signed as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(a) and Local Rule 131(b). Accordingly, on July 28, 2020, the Court gave Plaintiff forty-five days to either pay the filing fee…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.