Sherman

(PC) Denham v. Sherman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20201:19-cv-01176California574 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PAUL DENHAM, 1:19-cv-01176-DAD-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF

VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL UNDER

vs. RULE 41 (ECF No. 36.) STU SHERMAN, et al.,

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO CLOSE FILE

Defendants.

16 Paul Denham (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 29, 2019, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) On October 17, 2019, the Court dismissed the Complaint for violation of Rule 8(a), with leave to amend. (ECF No. 13.) On November 18, 2019, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 19.) On August 31, 2020, the court dismissed the First Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim, with leave to amend. (ECF No. 34.) On September 28, 2020, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal of this case. (ECF No. 36.) Plaintiff has a right to voluntarily…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.