Pabon
(PC) Cunningham v. Pabon
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20201:20-cv-00862California1,662 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8 DEMONTREY ANDRE CUNNINGHAM, Case No. 1:20-cv-00862-EPG (PC) 9 Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER
v. ORDER ALLOWING PLAINTIFF’S
COMPLAINT TO PROCEED
RAMON PABON, and HERMAN AGAINST DEFENDANTS RAMON
ESPINOZA, PABON AND HERMAN ESPINOZA
FOR EXCESSIVE FORCE IN Defendants. VIOLATION OF THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT
(ECF NO. 1)
17 Plaintiff, Demontrey Andre Cunningham, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 18 forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 23, 2020, Plaintiff 19 filed his complaint, which is now before the Court for screening. (ECF No. 1). 20 The Court finds that Plaintiff has stated a cause of action against Defendants Ramon 21 Pabon and Herman Espinoza for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment.
I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT
23 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by inmates seeking relief against a 24 governmental entity or officer…