Perez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAYMOND JONES, Case No. 1:19-cv-01553-NONE-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE

COURT’S ORDERS

PEREZ, et al., 21-DAY DEADLINE Defendants.

16 On March 19, 2020, the Court issued a screening order directing Plaintiff to file a first amended complaint curing the deficiencies in his pleading. (Doc. 14.) On July 29, 2020, the Court granted Plaintiff his third extension of time to comply with the screening order, and directed Plaintiff to file an amended complaint with 30 days. (Doc. 21.) Although more than the allowed time has passed, Plaintiff has failed to file an amended complaint. The Local Rules, corresponding with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, provide, “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with … any order of the Court may be grounds for the imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions … within the inherent power of the…